Blu-ray Review: The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp

What’s expected of a career military man? And what’s expected of a human being?

These questions are at the heart of Michael Powell and Emeric Pressburger’s epic masterpiece, The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp. Made in London at the height of World War II, it follows the 40-year career of Clive Candy (later Clive Wynne-Candy) through three wars and the peaces in between.

Candy is a decent fellow, born into money but not prone to putting on airs. He believes that rules and traditions are there to be followed, and he takes great pride in the fact that England always fights honorably (his viewpoint, and the film’s but not mine). His beliefs will be challenged over the picture’s nearly three-hour running time.

It’s an easy, entertaining, and thoughtful three hours. Powell and Pressburger have filled the story with love, heartbreak, humor, light satire, cinematic panache, and a remarkable talent for moving the story forward in unusual and delightful ways.

I discussed this film in detail last October, in Love, Friendship, Aging, and Playing by the Rules: The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp, and I don’t want to repeat myself. So let me mention a few things I didn’t bring up then.

Although the film encompasses a man’s life, it avoids much of what would conventionally be considered dramatic or exciting. We know, for instance, that he received the Victoria Cross during the Boer War, but we’re never shown why. Important characters die in the years between one scene and the next.

But Colonel Blimp isn’t about the big, exciting moments. It’s about friendship, love, and adapting to changing time. But then, so is life.

The British Government, and especially Winston Churchill, hated this film and wanted to keep it from getting made. This seems odd, because Colonel Blimp may be the most patriotically British film ever made. It glories in England’s sense of fair play (which was never all that fair), even as it preaches that the time for fair play is over.

I admit to being confused by one off-screen transition. When he’s young, he’s Clyde Candy. After he marries a woman named Barbara Wynne, he remains Clyde Candy, and she’s Mrs. Clyde Candy. Then he’s suddenly Clyde Wynne-Candy. I don’t know if such name changes were common in England in the first half of the 20th century.

However the main character got his name (which, either way, isn’t Colonel Blimp), this is a film to see, to revisit, and to treasure.

First Impresssion

imageLike most Criterion discs, The Life and Death of Colonel Blimp comes in a clear plastic case with an artful cover. Inside you’ll find a single disc, and a colorful booklet dominated by an essay by Molly Haskell.

How Does It Look?

Cinematographer Georges Perinal shot Colonel Blimp in three-strip Technicolor, and used that amazing and difficult format in subtle and beautiful ways. The film has recently undergone a major, 4K restoration, and when I saw it theatrically last fall, it looked great.

It still does. The details, the rich color palate, and the way the color red pops when the filmmakers want to control your eyes, all work as they should. It’s a great-looking disc of a great-looking film.

How Does It Sound?

As is Criterion’s custom, the original mono track is reproduced here in uncompressed PCM. There were a few moments when I had trouble understanding the dialog, but not many. For the most part, it was a reasonably good reproduction of a well-made 1943 soundtrack.

And the Extras

  • Commentary by Martin Scorsese and Michael Powell: Powell clearly recorded his commentary first, and Scorsese (a major fan of the film) came in later to fill the blank spaces–or at least some of them. Powell, who was 82 or 83 when he recorded the commentary in 1988, speaks in a dull monotone, although the stories he tells are fascinating. Scorsese’s stories are better told, but not quite as interesting. There’s too much time when neither of them is speaking.
  • Introduction by Martin Scorsese: 14 minutes. HD. He covers quite a bit of ground here, discussing his first time seeing the film on TV as a child, the problems with the British war office, and how the government kept Laurence Olivier from being in the picture. He also discusses how Colonel Blimp influenced Raging Bull.
  • A Profile of Colonel Blimp: Making of doc. 24 minutes. SD. Made in 2000, this is a reasonably interesting but conventional making-of doc.
  • Restoration Demonstration: 5 minutes. HD. Very briefly, Scorsese describes three-strip Technicolor, the issues involved with restoring it, and the challenges that this particular film brought with it.
  • Optimism and Sheer Will: 29 minutes. HD. Thelma Schoonmaker Powell is both Scorsese’s film editor and Powell’s widow. Here she discusses Powell’s personal relationship to the film. Oddly, the credits are in French.
  • Stills Gallery
  • David Low’s Colonel Blimp: Years before the movie, cartoonist David Low created the character of Colonel Blimp. Here we get a collection of his cartoons. I can’t help thinking these would look better in a book.

Blu-ray Review: Brazil

George Orwell might have created something like Brazil if he had had a sense of humor. But since he didn’t (at least not any that shows up in his work), the task was left to Terry Gilliam to create this absurd, dark, tragic, yet hilarious look into a dystopian world of bureaucracy gone mad.

A controversial film with a troubled history and four different versions, Brazil combines frightening social commentary with brilliant comedy. Criterion just released this Blu-ray, along with an extensive collection of extras.

Set "Somewhere in the 20th Century," and obviously in England, Brazil follows the adventures of Sam Lowry, a lowly government bureaucrat who wants to remain a lowly government bureaucrat (Jonathan Price). But when the wrong man is arrested and dies under torture, and Sam consequently meets the woman of his dreams, his already-teetering world comes crashing down.

The real star of the film isn’t Price (who’s wonderful), but the society in which his character lives–a place overwhelmed with odd-looking and barely working technology, and a cruel, heartless bureaucracy. Every room is filled with wide ducts carrying..who knows what. Televisions and computers have tiny screens, with larger magnifying screens in front of them. (The film was made in 1985, when home computers were still a novelty, yet it predicts a world where people can sneak peaks at movies while the boss isn’t looking.) Automated gadgets are overly complex and always breaking down.

Every so often, something blows up. The government blames these explosions on terrorists, but you can’t take this government at its word. The explosions could easily be the result of a badly-designed, crumbling infrastructure.

It doesn’t matter, of course. The "terrorist" bombings gives the government  an excuse to arrest anyone who may be the slightest bit suspicious, torture them for information, and then bill them for the expenses. ("Don’t fight it," a friendly guard tells a victim awaiting torture. "It could ruin your credit rating.") The department that tortures prisoners is called Information Retrieval.

Michael Palin–like Gilliam a Monty Python veteran–plays the torturer as an outwardly nice guy, somewhat smarmy, and professionally ambitious. He always has a friendly smile.

Sam escapes from the horrors of his society by dreaming. When he sleeps or daydreams, he’s a heroic figure with wings, soaring through the skies and rescuing a fair maiden from assorted villains. These dreams tell us a lot of Sam as a person–he’s an inept fool who wants to be a superhero (I can identify with that). His heroic desires will lead to both tragedy and an odd sort of victory.

For all its dark subject matter, Brazil is an extremely funny movie. Gilliam’s extraordinary sense of visual humor provides the machines gone wild, the army of bureaucrats dancing down the hall, and some near-perfect and highly original double takes. His screenplay collaborators, Tom Stoppard and Charles McKeown, add a layer of that wonderfully British, low-key verbal wit. Robert DeNiro, in what I believe was his first comic role, steals a few scenes as a heroic repairman.

Brazilian History

imageThere’s no point discussing Criterion’s Blu-ray without first covering the film’s problematic history.

Universal Pictures and 20th Century-Fox jointly financed Brazil, with Universal owning North American rights and Fox the International ones. Gilliam’s contract gave him final cut, provided the film was no longer than 120 minutes.

Gilliam turned in a 142-minute cut, which Fox immediately released in Europe. That explains why this version is generally called the European Cut.

But Universal executives hated the film. They were horrified to discover that Gilliam had used their money to create a work of art.

Hoping to please them, Gilliam recut it, but could only get it down to 132 minutes–a version now known as the American Cut. Universal took the movie away from him, and started massively reworking it, making Sam a much more of a conventional hero, and giving the picture a happy ending.

While the studio was butchering his film, Gilliam took the fight public, with an ad in Variety and special screenings of the American Cut. Based on these screenings, the Los Angeles Film Critics Association proclaimed Brazil the Best Film of 1985.

That shamed Universal into releasing the American cut, but it also pissed them off. They continued to work on their own version, and when the film’s theatrical run was over, they sold their 94-minute "Love Conquers All" cut to television.

Meanwhile, the European Cut–which could reasonably be called the director’s cut–was occasionally screened here in American. Eventually, Universal made this one available for revival theaters.

In the 1990s, Criterion approached Gilliam about doing a Director’s Signature Laserdisc release. He accepted, but chose to create yet another version. This one, sometimes called Terry’s Final Cut, and running 143, became the new standard–and has been released on DVD and Blu-ray by both Universal (bare bones) and Criterion (lots of extras). It is not, I believe, significantly different than the European Cut.

First Impression

2012-12-06 18.54.22Criterion ships the two-disc Brazil in a standard-sized, clear case. Unfortunately, it’s one of those cases where disc 1 is over disc 2, so you have to remove it get to the second disc. The first disc is tricky to remove, and the second one is much worse. I’m always worried that I’m going to break one.

It also comes with a thin book that includes a sometimes-interesting but uneven essay by David Sterritt.

How Does It Look?

Terry Gilliam likes to fill his movies with small, visual details. And he never did that more than in Brazil–his first film on a Hollywood budget.

Criterion’s transfer does justice to Gilliam’s vision, allowing you to examine, appreciate, and wallow in Gilliam and his collaborators’ wild imaginations. The absurd, overly-complicated machinery, the dank ugliness of the homes and factories, and the comic facial expressions all come out here better than they ever have before in a home video format. Brazil cries out for Blu-ray.

How Does It Sound?

Like most Hollywood movies of the 1980s, Brazil was originally released in the 35mm Dolby Stereo format. This involved two-track stereo media, and some electronic wizardry to send the sounds from those two tracks in four separate directions–left, center, right, and surround. Most home theater sound systems can decode that electronic wizardry, referred to now as Dolby Surround 2.0.

So it’s appropriate that Criterion has provided Brazil in a Dolby Surround 2.0 soundtrack, mastered with DTS-HD Master Audio lossless compression. In other words, it’s the original theatrical mix, only it sounds better. Much better.

And the Extras

When Criterion released Brazil on laserdisc, they included a mammoth selection of extras, all of which were ported to the three-disc DVD boxed set, and now to the two-disc Blu-ray package. This time around, they’ve updated some of the extras.

Disc 1

This disc contains Terry’s final cut of the film. The only extra is Gilliam’s commentary, which is well-worth listening to.

But there are two extras I wish were on this disc. Criterion should have used Blu-ray’s seamless branching technology to include the European and American cuts, as well.

Disc 2

imageThe biggest extra on this disc is the 94-minute Love Conquers All version. I found this too depressing to watch until I tried it with David Morgan’s fascinating commentary. With that, it’s a must for any Brazil fan.

One irony here: In some ways, this is the more radical version, since the happy ending celebrates violent revolution against society.

You also don’t want to miss The Battle of Brazil, a 55-minute documentary on the various versions and the controversy surrounding them.

Another doc, "What is Brazil," was shot as during the film’s production. It’s breezy and fun, but not essential.

A section called "The Production Notebook" contains short docs on how the film was made. It covers screenwriting, storyboards, design, special effects, fashion, and the musical score. This section has been improved since the Laserdisc and DVD versions, replacing screens to text with narration.

Brazil deserves royal treatment. Criterion has provided it.

Blu-ray Review: Rashomon

As I watched Criterion’s beautiful new Blu-ray edition of Akira Kurosawa’s Rashomon, I noticed how patterns of three ripple through this masterpiece. You have, of course, the love triangle (well, more like a lust and violence triangle) that centers the story. But you also have the three men under the Rashomon gate. And the three intertwined locations where the complex story is told.

I’ve written about Rashomon before, specifically in Kurosawa Diary, Part 7: Rashomon. There, I wrote about where it stood in relation to Kurosawa’s films before and after it. This time, I’ll concentrate on the film itself.

In medieval Japan, a notorious bandit waylays a high-born couple in the woods, ties up the husband, and rapes the wife. The husband is killed, but who killed him and how? This story is told in flashbacks, and in flashbacks within flashbacks. They contradict each other.

Kurosawa, a director known for long and expensive epics, made Rashomon as a chamber piece. It runs less than 90 minutes, contains only eight actors, and was shot entirely out of doors during daylight hours. Not a frame is wasted.

The entire story is told within three locations, cutting back and forth between them. When the film moves to a different location, it also moves to a different time. Or more precisely, to a flashback.

The framing story is set under the large Rashomon gate, already a crumbling ruin when the story is set. Three men take refuge there from a rainstorm. They talk about a police investigation. Two of them gave testimony as witnesses, and they’re shocked by the contradictory stories and the larger implications of such contradictions. The third man, a cynic, enjoys listening to their stories and mocks them for their concern.

The second setting, also a framing story, appears to be a police yard. All we see is the ground, a wall, and people talking to an unheard, off-screen presence–presumably an investigator. Even the dead man, speaking through a medium, tells his version of what happened in the forest.

That forest is the third setting, and shows the incidents that fuel what everyone says in the others. Once again, it concentrates on three people–the no-love triangle that fuels the story. The husband shows utter contempt for everyone, including his wife (especially after she’s been raped). The bandit, motivated by a lust he confuses with love, wants to marry the woman whose life he has just ruined. And the wife, with no possible choices within the framework of her strict society, manipulates both men for ends she’s not entirely sure of.

The film also contains what I believe are Kurosawa’s first two swordfights–or, more accurately, two very different versions of the same swordfight. From the winner’s point of view, the duel is as romantic and exciting as anything with Errol Flynn and Basil Rathbone. But from the point of view of a third party, comic ineptitude reigns, at least until the fight becomes, in its own clumsy way, frighteningly deadly.

Here, finally in high-def, is one of the best films by the world’s greatest filmmaker. You can’t possibly expect me to be objective.

imageFirst impression

This single disc package comes in a slightly thicker-than-usual clear plastic case. The front cover sports a color illustration of star Toshiro Mifune by Eric Skillman.

In addition to the disc, the case includes a 44-page booklet, which includes the film’s cast and credits, two essays (by Stephen Prince and Kurosawa himself, excerpted from his autobiography), the two short stories that the screenplay was based on, and "About the Transfer." The book also contains additional Skillman illustrations.

How it looks

Rashomon is a movie of textures. Dappled light coming through the leaves. Bright sunlight and flickering shade. Torrential rain. Human skin, wet and beaded with sweat. Photographed by the great Kazuo Miyagawa, it’s one of the most beautifully photographed black and white films ever shot.

Unfortunately, time has not been good to Rashomon‘s original source material. The camera negative and the prints made from it are warped, torn, and in poor condition. Fortunately, the film was painstakingly restored in 2008, and while the restoration didn’t quite bring it up to the original sparkling quality, it got close.

This Blu-ray is one major beneficiary of that restoration. I can’t call it consistent, but much of it glistens with the light, shadow, and wetness of Kurosawa’s and Miyagawa’s images. And even at it’s weak points, the transfer is still passible.

Except for one odd error. About 25 minutes into the movie, something really strange happens in one of those Kurosawa-patented wipes. As the wipe moves from left to right, replacing one shot with another, an extra bit of new shot appears on the left. I’ve never seen this problem before, and it’s certainly not on the older DVD.

How It Sounds

As usual, Criterion provides us with the original mix as an uncompressed PCM soundtrack. The audio strains a bit in loud scenes, but that’s the limits of 1950 Japanese sound recording, not of the disc. This is certainly as good, and probably better, than what Kurosawa originally signed off on.

The disc also comes with a Dolby Digital, laughably-bad, dubbed English-language track. Here, the actors all speak English with fake Japanese accents.

And the Exras

By Criterion standards, the offerings aren’t extraordinary. Most of them came with Criterion’s original DVD release. All of the video extras look like standard definition.

  • Commentary by Donald Richie. His voice is a little dull, but what he says is usually interesting. He talks about composition, character, editing, and plenty more.
  • Robert Altman on Rashomon: 7 minutes. Not that interesting.
  • The World of Kazuo Miyagawa: 13 minutes . Excerpt from a Japanese TV documentary about the cinematographer. Really fascinating.
  • NEW: A Testimony as an Image: 68 minutes. Rashomon script supervisor Teruuyo Nogami interviews people she worked with while making the film. Badly shot and edited, but be patient and you’ll get to some good stories.
  • NEW: Interview with Takashi Shimura: 16 minutes. Audio, only. A 1961 radio interview with the actor by Gideon Bachmann, with Donald Richie translating.
  • Original trailer:

Beautiful, exciting, depressing, existential, and in its final moments inspiring, Rashomon belongs on any list of great motion pictures. At least, that’s how I remember it.

Blu-ray Review: Children of Paradise

The one great black and white sound epic, Marcel Carné’s and Jacques Prévert’s love letter to France and to the theater, draws you in like a miracle. And why not? The movie’s very existence is a miracle. How could they shoot a grand story on such a lavish scale during the last months of the Nazi occupation, when finding enough food was a major challenge?

How bad was it? Production designer Alexandre Trauner and composer Maurice Thiriet did their work while hiding from the Nazis and Nazi collaborators. One of the supporting actors was a collaborator and had to flee from the resistance; his part was reshot. By the time the film was released in March of 1945, Paris was liberated, and the "clandestine" contributors were properly credited. But the star, Arletty, could not attend the premiere; she was under house arrest for the crime of sleeping with a German officer.

I wrote extensively about Children of Paradise in March, so rather than repeating myself, I’ll just point you to the earlier article, and go on with a discussion of the Blu-ray itself.

First Impression

children_of_paradise_boxFrom the outside, the two-disc set comes in a standard Criterion box. The cover is a reproduction of one of Trauner’s pre-production paintings.

When you open the box, you’ll find both discs on the same side, one stacked offset over the other. I don’t know if this type of configuration endangers the discs, but I always fear that I will damage them when I remove one.

The first disc contains the full, three-hour, two-part movie (the older DVD version put each section of the film on a separate disc). It’s only extra is the commentary. The second disc (also a Blu-ray) contains the other supplements.

The package also contains a 40-page booklet, with an essay by Dudley Andrews and an interview with director Carné made in 1990.

How it Looks

Thanks to Pathé’s new restoration, Children of Paradise probably looks better than it ever has before. It certainly looks better than it has in decades. It’s not razor-sharp with fine detail, but it never was. This is a romantic look at a past century, with much of it slightly soft focus by choice. Pathé was right not to over-sharpen it.

This new restoration allows you to really appreciate cinematographer Roger Hubert’s realistic yet stylized lighting scheme, especially in the scenes set on theatrical stages. This is as close as you’ll ever come to a gas-lit, early 19th century theater.

Criterion did a fine job converting Pathé’s restoration to the Blu-ray format (assuming that there was much work to be done). This is easily the best Children of Paradise you’re likely to ever see at home, and very close to what you’d see today in a theater. I suspect it looks better than any theatrical presentation you saw before this year.

How it Sounds

As is Criterion’s Blu-ray policy with mono titles, Children of Paradise’s soundtrack is presented in uncompressed PCM. There are a few instances where the opulent, symphonic music strains with distortion, but that’s a reflection on the limitations of the original recording.

And the Extras: Disc 1:

  • Bookmarks: As is standard for Criterion, the Children of Paradise Blu-ray has a timeline. You can insert bookmarks anywhere in the movie and return to them later on.
  • Commentary: (Or perhaps I should say commentaries.) The first part of the film has a commentary by Brian Stonehill; the second by Charles Affron. Stonehill covers a lot of ground, discussing, for instance, script notes about the characters and Picasso’s influence on the film’s design. Affron’s covers similar ground and isn’t as interesting.

    And the Extras: Disc 2

  • Terry Gilliam Introduction: 5 minutes. Shouldn’t an introduction to the film go on the same disc as the movie? Either way, it’s not all that interesting.
  • Restoration Demonstration: 4 minutes. The difference between the original camera negative and the 4K restoration is just amazing. Scratches, tears, custom stamps, and mold disappear to reveal the beautiful shades of gray in between. I know some people will insist that the negative was more "authentic;" I don’t buy it.
  • US Trailer: 3 minutes. Funny how a timeless masterpiece never gets old, but its trailer sure does.
  • Once Upon a Time: "Children of Paradise": 51 minutes. 2009 documentary by Julie Bonan about its making and impact. Very little on impact, actually. It’s not exceptional as such documentaries go, except when dealing with the occupation issues. But definitely worth checking out.
  • The Look of Children of Paradise: 22 minutes. Fascinating visual essay on the design. Very interesting discussion of the men (all men) most important in the film’s visual style. Much of it concerns Alexandre Trauner, the Jewish production designer who worked in hiding and was not able to visit the set.
  • The Birth of "Children of Paradise": 63 minutes. A 1967 German TV documentary made up mostly of interviews with the picture’s creators, and with some then-young French filmmakers. Kind of strange, because the interviews are in French, verbally translated by the narrator into German, which is subtitled in English. The best moment has Claude Lelouch talking about why Children of Paradise, almost by default, is old-fashioned and no longer worthwhile. I hope that, now that he’s older and presumably wiser, he can laugh at what he said.
  • Children of Paradise is one of the great films; one that you can return to again and again. I’m glad that Pathé gave it the restoration it deserved. And I’m just as glad that I have such an excellent reproduction of that restoration in my home collection.

    The Blu-ray goes on sale on Tuesday.

    On David Pogue, Piracy, and the Call for Making Movies Available Online Immediately

    Last week, tech journalist David Pogue wrote a piece for the Scientific American calling for the Hollywood studios and the MPAA to make new movies available for streaming and downloads as soon as they open in theaters.

    Streaming movies offers instant gratification: no waiting, no driving—plus great portability: you can watch on gadgets too small for a DVD drive, like phones, tablets and superthin laptops.

    His basic argument is that people are forced to download illegal copies because they would otherwise have to wait a few months. Even worse, some movies are still not available online.

    From an economic point of view, his argument might make sense, although I shudder to think of what that would do the already-struggling movie theaters. But as a lover of motion pictures, the argument makes no sense to me, at all.

    If you need to see the latest blockbuster so badly that you can't wait for it come out online, why not spend a few dollars and see it properly? And by properly, I mean in a theater. A film isn't meant to be background noise, but an immersive experience–preferably a communal one with an audience.

    Yes, I know: But you can't watch it on your phone! To which I reply: Why would you want to? That's not a movie. It's not even television. It's a peephole.

    And if you really can't afford tickets, wait a few months and rent the DVD–or better yet, the Blu-ray. Nothing else you can watch at home matches the image and sound quality of a Blu-ray. Yes, I know that some PPV services offer Blu-ray's 1080p resolution; I've even tested them. And believe me, Blu-rays look better.

    Okay, so you're a complete hermit, and you're determined to never leave your house again. So if you can't stream a movie, you can't watch it.

    Guess what! Between Netflix and Hulu Plus, you've got an incredible collection of films. Hulu's Criterion channel alone has hundreds of the best motion pictures ever made, and unlike the rest of Hulu, there are no commercials. Netflix has a pretty impressive collection, too, and a more diverse one.

    So don't complain that movies are too inconvenient to see. Give them a little respect, and the inconvenience will seem like a small price to pay.

    Full Disclosure: Many years ago, David Pogue pirated three works of mine…accidentally, of course. Other people had pirated intentionally and he thought they were anonymously written when in fact I held the copyright. I long ago accepted his apology.

    Blu-ray Review: Jaws

    Universal Studios must have been an interesting place in the 1970s. As Alfred Hitchcock’s career wound down, Steven Spielberg’s started up. I don’t know if they ever met, but there’s no doubt that the young film school graduate had studied the master’s work.

    In his second theatrical feature and first big hit (and also, I think we can say today, his first masterpiece), Spielberg showed complete control and understanding of Hitchcockian manipulation. Watch the early scene where Police Chief Brody (Roy Scheider) sits at the beach, nervously watching the swimmers and knowing that a shark may be prowling the water. Notice how extras cross close to the camera, creating wipes as we move in to closer and closer shots of Scheider. Or how a shift-focus tells us that he’s not paying attention to the person talking to him.

    To say nothing of the times where Spielberg makes you jump out of your seat and scream–at least the first time you see the movie.

    People associate Jaws with three men in a boat, but the picture is more than half over jaws2before the shark chase really starts. Before that, Spielberg treats us to a suspenseful, witty variation of Henrik Ibsen’s classic play, An Enemy of the People. Like Ibsen’s  Thomas Stockmann, Brody knows there’s something deadly in the water. But the town depends on visitors coming for the water, and that sets up a moral vs. economic conflict. (I don’t know if Jaws novelist Peter Benchley intentionally borrowed from Ibsen or even commented on the similarity.)

    Benchley and Spielberg paint Brody as a more troubled and wavering figure than Ibsen’s noble Stockmann. When first confronted with public pressure, Brody caves in. It takes him a long time to become a hero. In addition, he’s scared of the water.

    But the fun really begins when he climbs into that little boat with old salt Quint (Robert Shaw) and young shark expert Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss), and the story moves from Ibsen to Herman Melville–the quest for the great white shark. While Brody tries to prove himself in a job for which he is profoundly wrong, the two experts–Quint and Hooper–clash over everything. It doesn’t help that Quint appears to be totally insane.

    And all the while, the title character is waiting to eat them.

    Jaws‘ phenomenal success changed how Hollywood operates (for two years, it was jaws_crowdthe biggest hit of all time). It created the summer blockbuster, which is now pretty much all that the major studios care about. Yet by today’s standards, it’s almost an independent, or at least indiewood film. The dialog-heavy first half, the social criticism, the rare, brief glimpses of the "monster," and the relatively low death count would make it art house fare today.

    Which is fine. That’s where masterpieces belong.

    But there’s one aspect of the story that has always bugged me. Before they go to sea, Quint complains about taking Hooper. Why doesn’t he complain about taking the far less qualified Brody?

    First Impression

    jaws_boxThis Universal 100th Anniversary edition of Jaws comes in a standard two-disc Blu-ray case, with a slip cover.

    When you insert the disc, it doesn’t just annoy you with trailers. It uses BD Live to stream trailers to you over the Internet. That takes longer than trailers already on the disc. Use the Skip Forward button on your remote to get passed them.

    How it Looks

    Beautiful. Newly restored, Jaws shows fine and bright detail like never before. Colors are spot on.

    Does it look exactly as it looked in 1975? It certainly looks better than the last 35mm print of Jaws I saw, but that one was showing its age.

    I have no complaints with this transfer.

    How it Sounds

    The disc includes two English soundtracks.

    The default is a new 7.1 mix, in lossless DTS Master Audio. I only listened to a bit of this mix. It sounded great, and didn’t overdo the surrounds.

    But I prefer the disc’s alternate: The original mono track, presented here in lossy, but not too lossy, DTS. It sounded crisp and clear, and had the immediacy that the story and setting required. Theoretically, a  lossless version would have been better, but I’m not sure I would have noticed the difference.

    And the Extras

    Universal has packed Jaws will so many extras they actually include instructions on the disc . Here’s what else they include:

  • Bookmarks: Press the green button on your remote and create a bookmark, so you can return to a favorite shot.
  • UHear: "Did I hear that line right?" Press the blue button on your remote and English subtitles turn on temporarily while the disc jumps back a bit.
  • The Making of JAWS: Two-hour documentary made in 1995 for the Laserdisc release. Very good.
  • Deleted Scenes and Outtakes: 14 minutes.
  • The Shark is Still Working: The Impact & Legacy of JAWS: 101 minutes. New documentary about the movie’s making and impact, which mostly avoids repeating stuff from the earlier doc. Oddly, this widescreen feature  is presented in standard def, letterboxed into a 4×3 video stream.
  • JAWS: The Restoration: 8 minutes. About the restoration.
  • From the Set: 9 minutes. British TV piece from 1984, while the film was being shot.
  • JAWS Archives: Very large selection of stills, divided into four categories: Storyboards, Production Photos, Marketing JAWS, and JAWS Phenomenon.
  • Theatrical Trailer
  • pocket BLU: Smartphone apps (for various platforms) that let you control Universal Blu-rays.
  • PlayStation 3 Controller
  • BD Live: This Internet-based Blu-ray technology is used more often for marketing than for real enhancements. And sure enough, select it here and you get a screen full of trailers. However, there’s an option on the BD-Live screen with the promising name Community. When I went to it, I was told that "There is currently no Community content for this title." Hopefully that will change after the disc hits the market.
  • DVD: The second disc in this two-disc set is a DVD, so you can watch the movie when you don’t have access to your Blu-ray player. It comes with a shorter, 50-minute version of the Making of doc.
  • Digital Copy: A sheet of paper provides a URL and password for downloading and/or streaming Jaws in assorted formats. That way, you don’t even need a DVD player.

    In all of those extras, you’ll find only one brief mention of Jaws II, Jaws 3-D, and Jaws: The Revenge. Yes, this film is so great that three bad sequels didn’t ruin its reputation.

  • Blu-ray Review: Love and Anarchy

    The political is personal in Lina Wertmüller’s moving tragicomedy about a country bumpkin who comes to Rome to assassinate Mussolini, and finds love in an upscale whorehouse. The story starts out funny, becomes surprisingly romantic, but never strays from an intense sadness.

    If you were too young in the 70s to watch R-rated, subtitled films, you may not realize just how important Wertmüller was in those days. Feminism was only beginning to love_and_anarchymake a dent in mainstream American culture, and Hollywood had no significant female directors (as if it has many of them now). Then, out of Italy comes these serious, thoughtful, artistic, and political films written and directed by a woman.

    The weird thing was: The only thing feminist about her films was the fact that she was making them. Some, especially Swept Away, were even accused of misogyny.

    Love and Anarchy didn’t suffer from that accusation. Wertmüller’s muse, Giancarlo Giannini, plays the country bumpkin, a character very different from the macho protagonists he played in other Wertmüller films. Massive freckles and bad hair hide his good looks, and he spends much of the picture looking astonished and confused by the big city and the prostitutes.

    He’s on a mission, of course, although the film never makes clear who sent him. His first stop is the whorehouse–not because he wants to get laid, but because his contact is one of the whores (Salome, played by Mariangela Melato). Things get complicated when he falls in love with Tripolina (Lina Polito), and she falls in love with him.

    Of course Salome and Tripolina are not their real names. But the would-be assassin goes by a false name, as well: Tunin.

    True love never did run smooth, but it’s especially rocky here. The fact that Tripolina has sex with other men for money is the least of their problems (Tunin gets her in her time off). More pressing is the fact that Tunin is on what is basically a suicide mission. It’s never said explicitly, but I couldn’t help suspecting that someone decided to send an expendable fool.

    Love and Anarchy starts out funny and turns surprisingly romantic, but there’s a sense of doom over everything. While strongly anti-Fascist, it takes a dim view of those who become romantically enamored with violent solutions. It fits no genre and offers no easy answers. It’s a must.

    How It Looks

    For a low-budget Italian film originally released in 1973, Love and Anarchy looks love_and_anarchy_boxpositively scrumptious. The colors look dead-on accurate, and details are sharp (except, of course, when they’re supposed to be soft). Film grain is visible, but not overwhelming. It never looks like video.

    I don’t know the source for this transfer, but it must have been a good one. Perhaps in 1973, Rome Technicolor knew how to treat a negative.

    How It Sounds

    The film’s original mono soundtrack is reproduced in lossless DTS-HD Master Audio 1.0. It sounds great, probably closer to what Wertmüller heard when she approved the final mix than anything heard in a movie theater of that time.

    And the Extras

    Almost nothing. Love and Anarchy comes only with a gallery of 12 production stills and a selection of three trailers.

    But the movie is good enough on its own to be worth buying.

    Blu-ray Review: The Gold Rush

    In 1925, Charlie Chaplin created what many consider his masterpiece: The Gold Rush. In 1942, he altered it to an extent that would make George Lucas blush. And he insisted to his dying day that the new version was the better one.

    This Tuesday, Criterion releases a superb Blu-ray of The Gold Rush that includes what goldrushare probably the best possible presentations of both versions. The menus and some of the extras describe the 1942 edition as “definitive,” but don’t you believe them. The original, 1925 version is as definitive as The Gold Rush gets, and is the genuine masterpiece. Fortunately, Criterion presents that in all its glory.

    Like Buster Keaton’s The General, The Gold Rush puts an iconic comic hero into the center of an otherwise serious period epic adventure. On those rare occasions when the camera isn’t on Chaplin the actor, Chaplin the auteur reminds us of the grim, torturous, and deadly character of the Alaskan Gold Rush, still recent history in 1925. People collapse from exhaustion, are murdered in cold blood, and die in an avalanche. Starvation is a very real threat (although in Chaplin’s hands, a funny one). Dance hall girls celebrating New Year’s Eve look sad and homesick as they sing Auld Lang Syne.

    While Keaton seamlessly integrated his comedy into the spectacle and action, Chaplin keeps them separate. His tramp seems superimposed onto the setting, and not a part of it. He’s not even dressed for an Alaskan winter, and realistically would soon freeze to death. For Chaplin, the period setting is a frame for holding comedy sequences, almost all of which take place in confined, indoor settings. Almost all of The Gold Rush, including most exteriors, were shot at the studio.

    But what comedy sequences he created there! I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen The Gold Rush, but the Thanksgiving dinner and the dance with the rolls still crack me up, as do a great many other, lesser-known scenes. My favorite? Probably when two intimidatingly large men fight over a rifle. They’re completely oblivious to Charlie’s presence, but no matter where in the room he goes, the rifle always points at him.

    I also love the dancehall scenes. Here Chaplin creates a real sense of a frontier goldrush-georgiacommunity, and puts his tramp character into this milieu as an alien who can’t possibly assimilate. The scenes are funny, touching, and romantic. There’s a moment when the dancehall girl ingénue (Georgia Hale) surveys the crowd, hoping to meet someone worth knowing. Charlie stands nervously next to her, hopelessly in love. In her longing to find someone special, her eyes look right through him as if he wasn’t there. Your heart breaks as you laugh.

    I don’t quite put The Gold Rush in the same stratified air as The General or Chaplin’s City Lights. But it’s close.

    Chaplin didn’t trust his audience to accept a silent film in 1942 (only six years after the release of his last silent, Modern Times). So before he rereleased the picture, he removed all of the intertitles, and added a narration.

    That might have worked had the narration been as terse as his intertitles, and if he had hired a great voice–say, Orson Welles–to read it. But instead he wrote a verbose narration, explaining much that doesn’t have to be said, and spoke it himself.

    There are reasons why Chaplin had his greatest success in silent films and not radio. His voice gets annoying very quickly. He’s overly excitable, melodramatic, and clearly in love with his lukewarm ability to do character voices. When characters’ move their silent lips, Chaplin tells you what they’re saying, in amateurish voices, even when it’s painfully obvious and no intertitle was used in the original. He also adds quick identifying statements like “Big Jim said…” And when characters aren’t talking, he often tells us what they’re doing, even though we can see it clearly for ourselves.

    It’s not all a loss. He succeeds in enhancing two brief moments with verbal jokes. Better yet, he shuts up during most of the major comic set pieces.

    In addition to the narration, Chaplin added an excellent musical score and sound effects. He also trimmed a few scenes without doing serious damage.

    First Impression

    goldrush-boxTypical for Criterion, The Gold Rush comes in a clear case a bit larger than a typical Blu-ray case. Criterion includes a 24-page booklet containing the film’s credits, an essay on the film by Luc Sante, James Agee’s review of the 1942 version, a brief piece on the restoration, and credits for the disc.

    How It Looks

    Original 1925 version: Years after Chaplin altered the film in 1942, he failed to both renew his copyright on the original and to preserve the physical film. This resulted in a lot of very bad, almost unwatchable prints.

    Over the course of many years, Kevin Brownlow and David Gill have  restored The Gold Rush to something approaching its original form. They consider the version on this disc to be a work in progress; they’re always hoping that new material will turn up.

    Most of this transfer looks very good, although it doesn’t measure up to the exceptional Blu-ray transfers of The General or Metropolis (well, most of Metropolis). The images are clear and detailed, with only occasional film-based artifacts. In the above-mentioned dancehall scenes, you can really appreciate how well cameraman Rollie Totheroh’s lighting created atmosphere and subtly separated Chaplin for the crowed, emphasizing his alienation.

    But then, every so often, it looked mediocre or worse. There’s only so much Brownlow and Gill could do with bad source material.

    1942 version: The image quality here is far more consistent, which is hardly surprising since it was better cared for and didn’t need a restoration. It looks very good throughout.

    How It Sounds

    Original 1925 version: Chaplin’s family insists that the restoration only be shown with Timothy Brock’s adaptation of Chaplin’s 1942 score. Although I would have liked one or two alternative scores, I can’t complain. Shorn of the irritating narration, this easily becomes Chaplin’s best work as a composer. It supports the film and never overwhelms it. Chaplin understood that funny images don’t need funny music.

    One odd touch: The score is almost completely devoid of musical sound effects. Even a gunshot doesn’t merit a bass drum or other instrument. Chaplin’s reason was obvious: He wrote this score for the 1942 version, which includes realistic sound effects. They were there, but not part of the musical score.

    Brock recorded this score with a full orchestra, and it’s presented in lossless DTS Master Audio 5.1 surround. Needless to say, it sounds great.

    1942 version: The original mono soundtrack is reproduced in uncompressed PCM. It sounds great, allowing you to fully appreciate what a bad speaking voice he had.

    And the Extras

    Hey, it’s Criterion!

    • Audio commentary for the 1925 version by Chaplin biographer and archivist Jeffrey Vance. This is an excellent commentary, and Vance makes a convincing argument that this is Chaplin’s best work–even if he didn’t quite convince me. He offers excellent insights into much of the film’s background, including its autobiographical elements.
    • Presenting The Gold Rush: 16 minutes. A quick overview of the film’s history, with emphasis on the restoration.
    • Chaplin Today: The Gold Rush: 27 minutes. A documentary on the making of the film. Made in 2002, this was also on the Warner Brothers DVD release, and is the only extra not new to this release.
    • A Time of Innovation: 19 minutes. Special effects wizard Craig Barron (Titanic, Raiders of the Lost Ark) discusses how cinematographer Rollie Totheroh achieved The Gold Rush’s effects entirely in the camera. Absolutely fascinating.
    • Music by Charles Chaplin: Composer/conductor Timothy Brock discusses Chaplin as a composer.
    • Four trailers

    Blu-ray Review: Manhattan

    Woody Allen followed the triumph of Annie Hall with a dead-serious drama that few people saw and even fewer liked: Interiors (Confession: I haven’t seen it). Luckily for his career, Allen followed Interiors with Manhattan.

    Like Annie Hall, Manhattan is a realistic, character-driven comedy about love, romance, and how the sexual urge messes up our lives. But since it’s not taking place in a character’s mind, it lacks the earlier film’s flights of fancy, and, while there are plenty of laughs, it isn’t near as funny. Those laughs almost all come from one-liners spoken by Allen himself. Since his character, Isaac, writes for television, we easily accept his quick and very funny wit. It helps, of course, that he’s played by Woody Allen.

    Isaac hates writing for television, and is working on a novel about the decline of civilization. He has two ex-wives; the last one (Meryl Streep) left him for another woman. She’s writing a book about their relationship that will reveal a great deal about his private life–an act she justifies on the grounds that the book is "honest."

    Isaac is now sleeping with Tracy (Mariel Hemingway), who is so much younger thanmanhattan_4char him it’s illegal. "I’m 42 and she’s 17. I’m older than her father. Can you believe that? I’m dating a girl, wherein, I can beat up her father." She’s falling in love with him, and he wishes she wasn’t. Isaac’s best friends are a married couple, Yale (Michael Murphy) and Emily (Anne Byrne). These seem happy, but Yale is having an affair with Mary (Diane Keaton); it started as a fling, but has become serious.

    Before the movie is over, most of these people are going to change partners and make some very bad mistakes. They’re going to hurt people they love, and you’ll react with disappointment, anger, understanding sympathy, and laughter.

    Allen and his collaborators–primarily co-writer Marshall Brickman, cinematographer Gordon Willis, and editor Susan E. Morse–tell the story efficiently, effectively, and visually. One scene with Allen and Keaton, in an exceptionally dark science museum (there are reasons why Willis is sometimes called "The Prince of Darkness"), carries a strong erotic undercurrent without their ever touching. In another powerful scene, Isaac, Mary, Yale, and Emily sit side-by-side at a concert, without saying a word, and the tension may make you want to explode.

    Another important collaborator died more than 40 years before the film was made: George Gershwin. Allen scored the film entirely with instrumental recordings of Gershwin tunes, most of them hits. Even without the lyrics, you can’t help noticing the songs, both because you already know them and because they’re played louder than traditional background music. No music says "New York" like a Gershwin tune.

    If Annie Hall is Woody Allen’s masterpiece, and I think it is, than Manhattan belongs in the small, second tier of his near masterpieces.

    How It Looks

    I don’t believe that New York ever looked as beautiful as it does here. Willis shot manhattan_bridgeManhattan in black and white and in Panavision (anamorphic ‘scope with Panavision lenses). The resulting deep gray scale and wide canvas sharpens the sense of a lively and vibrant city filled with art, culture, and intelligent but troubled people. Many individual shots could serve as postcards or tourist advertising. Others could be used to teach intimate composition in a widescreen aspect ratio.

    20th Century-Fox and MGM, who together are releasing this original United Artist picture, have captured Willis’ work splendidly. The gray scale is spot-on perfect, and you can see fine detail throughout the picture. Night scenes are often grainy, but they always were.

    How It Sounds

    The movie’s original mono soundtrack is recreated here in lossless DTS-HD Master manhattan_boxAudio. It can’t sound better than this and still be true to Woody Allen’s intent.

    And the Extras

    Woody Allen doesn’t approve of DVD and Blu-ray supplements. The only one on this disc is the original theatrical trailer.

    Blu-ray Review: Notorious (1946)

    Few filmmakers could make a thriller that has the audience biting their nails about whether the champagne will run out before the party is over–or a romance where the hero treats the heroine with contempt, but the villain truly and tenderly loves her. Yet the team of Ben Hecht and Alfred Hitchcock could put all that and more into one great motion picture.

    That picture is Notorious. MGM and 20th Century-Fox are releasing this Blu-ray version of Hitchcock’s masterpiece (well, one of his masterpieces). Neither company was involved with the film’s production or original release.

    Ingrid Bergman plays Alicia Huberman, the apex of this romantic triangle. The daughter of a convicted Nazi spy, she’s made a reputation for herself as a good-time party girl. She drinks heavily and apparently sleeps around (something that an American movie could only vaguely imply in 1946). Then a government agent named Devlin (Cary Grant; we’re never told the character’s first name) offers her a chance to redeem her reputation and prove her patriotism. She’s to fly with him to Rio, and then…who knows?

    By the time they get her assignment, Alicia and Devlin are in love–a complication that makes the assignment very bad news. She is to befriend and seduce an old friend of her father’s, Alexander Sebastian (Claude Rains). She succeeds beyond everyone’s hopes. Sebastian clearly loves Alicia deeply, and seems as devoted to her happiness as he is to reviving the Nazi cause.

    What we have here is a heroine who, on orders of the man she loves, is literally sleeping with the enemy. And the man who sent her onto this dangerous and degrading mission burns with jealousy, hating her for doing what he told her to do.

    Neither Hitchcock nor Hecht are known as ahead-of-their-time feminists, yet Notorious clearly condemns male hypocrisy concerning female sexuality. Note the scenes with Devlin and his superiors. When Alicia is with them, Devlin can’t even look at her, while the other men treat her with chivalrous courtesy. But when she’s out of the room, they talk of her with contempt, while Devlin defends her honor.

    Hitchcock fills the second half of Notorious with some of his scariest set pieces. The wine cellar sequence has been studied by would-be filmmakers for decades, and with good reason. And the long walk down the stairs can tie your stomach in knots–no matter how many times you’ve seen the movie.

    Before things get scary, Notorious contains one of cinema’s greatest kisses. The Production Code Authority ruled that no on-screen kisses could last longer than 30 seconds. Hitchcock got around that rule by breaking the long kiss up into multiple, shorter kisses. Kiss, talk a bit, kiss again, and so on. From the audience’s point of view, it’s one very long kiss.

    Like so much of Hitchcock’s work, Notorious is great entertainment. But it’s impossible to watch without thinking about hypocrisy, male chauvinism, and the moral compromises people make to fight a worse evil.

    How It Looks

    I suspect that the original Notorious negative has been lost or destroyed; or maybe it’snotorious_box just in very bad condition. While the video quality is a big improvement over the Criterion DVD, it doesn’t measure up to the best transfers I’ve seen from other black-and-white films of similar vintage. The image is just a touch soft, and a little too grainy. In one or two places I spotted what looked like nitrate decomposition.

    Yet the transfer is more than acceptable. There’s many a fine detail that I haven’t seen since I last caught Notorious on the big screen. The bright Rio sun and the dark noir shadows played their atmospheric roles without hurting the picture. This is probably as good as Notorious is going to get.

    As is often the case with films of the 1940′s, the HD transfer sometimes brings out the fakery. Only a second unit crew visited Rio, and most of the exterior scenes involving the actors were done in front of rear-projection screens. That’s extremely obvious here, but it was just as obvious with the original audiences. In 1946, people accepted such techniques the way we accept fake-looking CGI today.

    (I’ve often wondered what Notorious would have been like if Hitchcock had made it a decade later. He would have shot it in Technicolor and VistaVision, and he would have shot the exteriors in Rio. It would have been a better looking movie, but it would lack much of the atmosphere that makes the film work.)

    How It Sounds

    MGM and Fox present Notorious with the original mono mix, in lossless DTS-HD Master Audio. It doesn’t sound like modern, explosive surround sound, but it’s not supposed to. This is the original soundtrack, sounding as good as it possibly can.

    And the Extras

    This disc comes with a large selection of extras. Some of them are even worth listening to.

    • Commentary by Film Professor Rick Jewell. Imagine signing up for a class in a subject that fascinates you, then discovering that the professor is the dullest lecturer alive. I gave up about half an hour into the lecture. He spent those 30 minutes droning on about the history of RKO.
    • Commentary by Film Professor Drew Casper. This one’s a lot better. Casper’s voice drenches with enthusiasm (sometimes too much enthusiasm) as he goes through the film shot by shot, discussing the characters, the story, the cinematography, and a lot of other topics. I didn’t agree with everything he said, but it was always interesting.
    • Isolated music and effects track.
    • The Ultimate Romance: The Making of Notorious: 28 minute. A pretty typical making-of documentary. Interesting, but not exceptional.
    • Alfred Hitchcock: The Ultimate Spymaster: 13 minutes. A number of film historians make the case that Hitchcock defined the spy genre, and influenced the James Bond films–although the Bond franchise lacks Hitchcock’s moral complexity. There’s a fair amount to think about here.
    • The American Film Institute Award: The Key to Hitchcock: 3 minutes. We get a few brief excerpts from Hitchcock’s AFI award ceremony. It includes his speech, where he honors his wife and primary collaborator, Alma Reville. That’s good, because too many people forget that Hitchcock was the famous half of a team.
    • 1948 Radio adaptation starring Joseph Cotton and Ingrid Bergman: 59 minutes. It’s a curious adaptation, vastly inferior to the film, of course, but interesting in how they adapt it to the shorter and audio-only medium. You even get to hear to the old commercials. It’s also the only extra on this disc that’s also on the Criterion DVD.
    • Two audio interviews with Hitchcock, one by Peter Bogdanovich and the other by François Truffaut
    • Restoration comparison: A very short look at how they fixed up the image from their original source material. They never say exactly what that source material was.
    • Theatrical trailer: This makes it look like a love triangle drama, with little suggestion of espionage or thrills.

    Here’s one of the great Hollywood movies, and MGM and Fox have done a solid job bringing it to us in Blu-ray.

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 49 other followers